Archives For daniel ellsberg


On May 11, 1973, charges against Daniel Ellsberg for his role in the Pentagon Papers case were dismissed by Judge William Byrne, who cited government misconduct, including attempts to bribe Ellsberg into silence by offering him a high-level position at the FBI. Before his identity was reveled as the person who orchestrated the leaks, Ellsberg had been a top analyst for the RAND Corporation, advising the Defense and State Department.

Ellsberg blew the whistle on the secret actions by the U.S. government in Vietnam by releasing 7,000 classified government documents to The New York Times, which published select information. You can read a number of books and articles about the importance of Ellsberg’s work, but the documentary, The Most Dangerous Man in America, offers the most in-depth look at the historical importance, and scope of government backlash against whistleblowers.

Daniel Ellsberg continues to remain relevant in today’s world, most notably his support of Bradley Manning, who is accused of leaking classified information to WikiLeaks. Manning was arrested while serving in Iraq in May 2010, and is currently awaiting a trial date. His previous detention conditions have been sharply criticized by human rights activists and international organizations as psychological torture.

Official press release on journalist Chris Hedges’ lawsuit against President Obama, and other administration, over NDAA unconstitutional detention of American citizens.

via Activists & Journalists Sue President, Defense Secretary Over Chilling Effect on Constitutional Protections.

Reporter Chris Hedges is one of many notable U.S. names who are joined in a series of lawsuits against President Obama, and administration, regarding the constitutionality of the 2012 NDAA detention provisions. The justifiable concern by media and press members sympathetic to protest movements, specifically the occupy protests, could be considered or treated as threats to national security.

In writer and journalist Naomi Wolf’s account of the below hearing, federal lawyers could not, or would not, give specifics to provisions of detention under NDAA, but could not rule out arresting reporters for reporting, occupy protestors for protesting, or a writer of a hypothetical book with political statements.

Credit: AP

If you remember back a few months, Ms. Wolf was arrested outside a private NY gala dinner after coming out and talking with occupy protestors. After informing the small crowd of their right to protest and encouraging them to peacefully assemble and walk single-file on the public sidewalk, she was arrested. Charges were later dropped.

The entire document is worth reading, and paints a clear picture of how few answers we’re getting from the federal government on these questionable new laws.

Others involved in the suit include Ms. Wolf, Cornel West, Daniel Ellsberg, and Noam Chomsky.

NDAA hearing notes | Naomi Wolf